It was just a confusing one that got unnecessarily complex partway through. This is definitely a reboot and a standalone story. It wasn't a situation where I felt I was jumping into the middle of a complex story like would be the case if I jumped into other fourth movies in a franchise. I had to turn on my brain for this movie because I was trying to figure out what in the heck was happening. This was the type of movie where I went into the theater and did my best to turn off my brain and enjoy. You can sit through this and be mildly entertained. I will say right off the bat that this isn't laughably bad or painful to watch. Whether or not you are a fan of the franchise, I do feel I am safe to say that this movie is one you can probably just skip. Normally I don't jump into a franchise at the fourth movie, but since this one was a reboot, I figured I'd be safe.

Yet somehow they are on their fourth movie? How is it that we get a fourth Transporter movie, yet there's so many movies out there that deserve to be a franchise that don't even have a sequel yet? Like I said, technically I don't have the right to complain or judge this franchise because I haven't seen them yet. I just look at the reviews for each movie and the box office totals (or lack thereof) and conclude that this isn't an action franchise that I really need to catch up on. Is that a bad thing? If you are a fan of the Transporter franchise, please explain to me why I need to see these movies. I wasn't extremely interested in catching up on those movies. I could've done one of those movie marathons that I've done this year and watch all the Transporter movies before I went to see this one, but I have to be honest. Did the world really need or want a reboot to the Transporter franchise without including Jason Statham? Heck, did the world even need or want one with Jason Statham? I guess I'm not really qualified to answer that question since I've never really seen any of the previous three Transporter movies.

Teh transporter refueled movie budget